This motion asserts that state police action against student protesters is constitutionally invalid unless prior judicial sanction from the High Court is obtained.
Aaj ki debate ka motion yeh hai: 'State Police Cannot Detain Student Protesters Without Prior High Court Permission' — yeh ek mahatvapoorn constitutional sawaal hai jo nagrikon ki azaadi aur rajya ki shakti ke beech ka nazuk santulan uthata hai. Main Nyaya, aaj ki moderator, dono pakshon ko zapya dawon ke saath aage aane ka nivedan karti hoon — toh sabse pehle, motion ke paksh mein, Counsel Aarav se guzarish karti hoon ki woh apna pehla tark rakhen.
My Lord, main Aarav, paksh ki taraf se daliil pesh karta hoon — yeh motion ek fundamental constitutional safeguard ki baat karta hai. Article 13 ke under, koi bhi executive action ya police power jo kisi naagrik ke fundamental rights — khaaskar Article 19(1)(b) ke under assembly ka adhikar aur Article 21 ke under personal liberty — ko bina kisi prior judicial oversight ke kuchalta hai, woh 'law' ki paribhasha mein void hai to the extent of that inconsistency. Isliye, My Lord, State Police ka yeh blanket power — bina High Court ki pooarv anumati ke student protesters ko detain karna — Article 13 ki kasauti par seedha fail hota hai, aur is motion ko is Court ko affirm karna chahiye.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 13
My lord, main Bina, vipaksh ki taraf se hoon, aur main seedha kehna chahti hoon — yeh motion ek aisi shart lagaata hai jo na Constitution mein hai, na kisi statute mein: ki police ko har student detention se pehle High Court ki permission leni hogi. Article 226, jo Aarav sahab ne paksh mein uthaya, High Court ko writ jaari karne ka adhikar deta hai — lekin yeh ek post-facto remedy hai, ek ex-ante veto nahi; Article 226 police ki operational powers par pehle se ruk lagaane ka zariya nahi hai. Aur Article 13 jo laws ko fundamental rights se inconsistent hone par void karta hai — woh tab apply hota hai jab koi enacted law ho jo rights ka hanan kare, na ki police ki har arrest ya detention ke liye pehle judicial clearance mandatory karne ka ground banta hai.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 226; Constitution of India · Article 13
My Lord, vipaksh ne detention ki prakriya par sawaal uthaya, lekin woh ek buniyadi sach se nazarein chura rahe hain — Article 13 ke antargat koi bhi executive action ya police procedure jo Fundamental Rights se inconsistent ho, woh void hai to the extent of inconsistency. Bina kisi prior judicial oversight ke student protesters ko detain karna Article 19 aur Article 21 ke seedha khilaaf hai, aur Article 13 yahi kehta hai ki aisi 'orders' aur 'notifications' bhi void hain jo in rights ko derogate karti hain. My Lord, isliye main yeh nivedan karta hoon ki High Court ki prior permission ka requirement sirf procedural nahi — yeh constitutionally mandated hai.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 13
My lord, paksh ne jo argument diya hai woh fundamentally flawed hai — kyunki Constitution ka Article 13 saaf kehta hai ki koi bhi 'law', ordinance, order ya notification jo fundamental rights ke viruddh ho, woh void hai to the extent of inconsistency; toh ek blanket prior-permission requirement — jo police ki immediate law-enforcement power ko judicially gate-keep kare — khud ek unconstitutional constraint ban jaati hai, jisme no statute, no provision aisa mandate karta hai. Main yeh bhi kehna chahti hoon ki Article 226 High Courts ko remedial jurisdiction deta hai — yeh ek curative tool hai, preventive licensing mechanism nahi; High Court post-facto writs issue kar sakti hai, lekin har detention se pehle uski permission lena constitutionally prescribed nahi hai, aur is motion ki maang is distinction ko poori tarah ignore karti hai.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 13; Constitution of India · Article 226
Is debate mein Petitioner ki taraf ne kaha ki bina High Court permission ke student protesters ki detention unke fundamental rights ka ullaghan hai, jabki Respondent ki taraf ne kaha ki police ko public order maintain karne ka vaidhanik adhikar hai aur prior judicial permission laagu karna practicable nahi. Meri balanced legal suggestion yeh hai ki State police detention powers aur student protest rights ke beech ek clear statutory framework banana chahiye — jisme Article 226 ke under High Court ka post-facto swift review mandatory ho, taaki na to public order compromise ho, na nagarikon ke constitutional rights. Ab main citizens se request karti hoon ki is debate ko rate karein aur apni raay zaroor dein.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 226