State-run law universities cannot impose blanket bans on student protests within campus, as such restrictions violate Article 19(1)(a) and (b) rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
Aaj ka motion hai: 'State Law Colleges Must Permit Student Protests Within Campus Premises' — yeh sawaal seedha student ke fundamental expression ke adhikar aur campus discipline ke beech ki takkar ka hai. Is mahattvapoorn vishay par dono pakshon ki daleelen sunne ke baad main ek balanced legal suggestion dungi — ab main Counsel Aarav se nivedan karti hoon ki woh apna paksh rakhein.
My lord, main yeh nivedan karta hoon ki Article 19(1)(a) aur 19(1)(b) ke tahat har nagarik ko speech, expression aur peaceful assembly ka fundamental right prapt hai — aur law colleges ke students is adhikar se bahar nahi hain. State law colleges, being state-funded institutions, ek public character rakhti hain, aur unke campus mein peaceful student protests ko blanket ban karna seedha is fundamental guarantee ka ullanghghan hai. Isliye is motion ko paksh mein manna poori tarah se constitutional mandate ke anukool hai.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 19
My lord, main Bina, vipaksh ki taraf se, is motion ka poora virodh karti hoon. Paksh yeh kehta hai ki state law colleges mein protests ko permit karna chahiye — lekin Dr. YSR Architecture and Fine Arts University Act, 2008 ka Section 34-2 saaf taur par prohibit karta hai ki koi bhi student aisi activity mein engage ho jo teaching, study, ya administration ko disrupt kare; aur yeh koi choti baat nahi, yeh ek statutory mandate hai. Campus ek academic sanctuary hai, protest ground nahi — aur ek blanket permission dena is statutory framework ko seedha undermine karega.
Ref: Dr.YSR Architecture and Fine Arts University Act, 2008 · Section 34-2
My lord, vipaksh kehta hai ki campus premises mein protest allow karna disorder paida karega — lekin yeh argument Article 19(1)(b) ke guaranteed right of peaceful assembly ko seedha negate karta hai, jo ki Constitution ne apne nagarikon ko diya hai, aur law students ko isse bahar nahi rakha ja sakta. Reasonable restrictions haan, Article 19(3) ke under lagai ja sakti hain — lekin blanket ban ek restriction nahi, ek fundamental right ka complete suppression hai. Main respectfully submit karta hoon ki State Law Colleges ka yeh dayitva hai ki woh in-campus peaceful protests ko regulate karein, prohibit nahi.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 19
My lord, paksh yeh kehta hai ki protest ek fundamental right hai — lekin Article 19(2) ke tahat yahi Constitution kehta hai ki reasonable restrictions lagaai ja sakti hain. Ab Dr. YSR Architecture and Fine Arts University Act ki Section 34-2(1)(a) dekhen — yeh seedha kahti hai ki koi bhi aisa activity jo teaching, study ya administration disrupt kare, campus par varjit hai. Main yeh maanti hoon ki state law colleges mein agar protests ko blanket permission milti hai, to yeh provision meaningless ho jaata hai — isliye motion ko allow karna kanoon ke viruddh hoga.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 19; Dr.YSR Architecture and Fine Arts University Act, 2008 · Section 34-2
To summarise: Petitioner-side ne Article 19(1)(a) aur (b) ke tahat students ke speech aur peaceful assembly ke fundamental rights ka haq maanga — campus ke andar protests ki permission milni chahiye. Respondent-side ne A5 ke Section 34-2 ka sahara liya — university mein violence, disruption ya obstruction ki koi bhi activity disciplinary action ki bhagi ho sakti hai, isliye blanket permission dena appropriate nahi. Meri balanced legal suggestion yeh hai ki State law colleges ek transparent, written policy banayein jisme peaceful, non-disruptive protests ke liye designated time aur space tay ho — Article 19 ke fundamental rights aur Section 34-2 ke institutional discipline dono ka samman hota rahe — aur ab main citizens se request karti hoon ki is debate ko apna honest rating dein aur batayein kaunsa paksh aapko zyada convincing laga.
Ref: Constitution of India · Article 19; 1Dr.YSR Architecture and Fine Arts University Act, 2008. · Section 34