Rajasthan Must Make Farmer Co-Ownership Mandatory in All Agri-Solar Projects

Nyaya Host · Intro

Aaj ka motion hai: 'Rajasthan Must Make Farmer Co-Ownership Mandatory in All Agri-Solar Projects' — yani kya Rajasthan mein sabhi agri-solar pariyojanaon mein kisanon ki sahbhagita aur sahswamitva anivarya kiya jaana chahiye? Yeh debate ek bahut hi mahatvapurn sawaal uthati hai — ki kya zameen ka malik aur uski livelihood ka kendra, woh kisan, sirf bhoomi dene wala rahe, ya energy transition ka hissedaar bhi bane. Main Counsel Aarav ko amantrит karti hoon ki woh is motion ke paksh mein apna pehla tarq pesh karen.

Aarav Paksh · For

My lord, main is motion ke poore paksh mein khada hoon — Rajasthan ke agri-solar projects mein kisan ki co-ownership mandatory honi chahiye, kyunki jo zameen kisan jotata hai, uska fal kisi corporate entity ki balance sheet mein nahi, balki uski apni jeb mein pahunchna chahiye. Abhi jo haal hai, usme kisan sirf lease ka kiraya paata hai — ek fixed amount — jabki solar energy ka munafa decades tak kisi aur ke paas jaata hai; yeh ek structural nainsafi hai jo is motion seedha theek karna chahta hai. Rajasthan, jo India ka sabse bada solar-potential rakhne wala state hai, wahan agar co-ownership mandatory ho, to kisan ek passive bystander nahi, balki ek equity partner banega — aur yahi is motion ki core demand hai jo main poori taakat se support karta hoon.

Bina Vipaksh · Against

My lord, main Bina, vipaksh ki taraf se arz karti hoon — paksh ki dalil sunne mein achhi lagti hai, lekin zameen par iski jamavat nahi hai. Rajasthan Farmers Participation in Management of Irrigation Systems Act, 2000 ke Section 1-3, jo Raj Act No. 35 of 2017 dwara substituted hai, uss Act ka scope sirf irrigation systems ke management tak seema karta hai — agri-solar projects mein mandatory co-ownership ka koi aadhar yahan nahi milta; paksh is provision ko galat context mein fit kar raha hai. Iske alawa, Rajasthan Land Laws Repealing Act, 2018 ki Section 4 saaf batati hai ki purane agrarian structure ke kai kanoon already repeal ho chuke hain — iska matlab yeh hai ki koi bhi nayi mandatory co-ownership scheme ek fresh, comprehensive legislative framework ke bina impose nahi ki ja sakti, aur yeh motion usi constitutional aur legislative vacuum ko nazar-andaz kar rahi hai.

Ref: Rajasthan Farmers Participation in Management of Irrigation Systems Act, 2000 · Section 1-3; rajasthan land laws repealing act, 2018 · Section 4

Aarav Paksh · Rebuttal

My Lord, vipaksh kehta hai ki co-ownership se private investment rukegi — lekin main maanta hoon ki yeh argument zimmedari se bhaagna hai. Kisan ki zameen use karo, uska faida bhi use milna chahiye — yeh basic naitik nyay hai, aur bina mandatory co-ownership ke agri-solar schemes sirf corporate land-grab ban jaati hain. Rajasthan ke annadata ke saath yeh aninsaafi nahi chalegi, aur is motion ka poora paksh main thos roop se leta hoon.

Bina Vipaksh · Rebuttal

My lord, Aarav bhai ne kaha ki mandatory co-ownership se investment rukegi — lekin main yeh maanti hoon ki jab tak kisan ko sirf 'beneficiary' ki jagah actual stakeholder nahi banaya jaata, tab tak koi bhi scheme uski zameen par bani, uske liye nahi, balki uski zameen ke khilaaf bani hai. Agar developer swechhik (voluntary) arrangements mein genuinely farmer-friendly hote, toh abhi tak Rajasthan ke agri-solar belt mein kisan kyun apni zameen se displaced ho rahe hain — voluntary ka record khud bolta hai. Isliye main firmly kehna chahti hoon ki bina mandatory co-ownership ke, yeh motion ka core demand — kisan ka real stake — kabhi pura nahi hoga.

Nyaya Host · Suggestion

Ek taraf ne kaha ki farmer co-ownership se unki zameen aur aajivika dono surakshit hongi, jabki doosri taraf ne kaha ki mandatory structure se private investment rukegi aur implementation mushkil hogi. Meri balanced legal suggestion yeh hai ki Rajasthan sarkar ke under Farmers Organisation ka dhaancha — jo pehle se irrigation management mein farmer participation ko institutionalise karta hai — usi model ko agri-solar projects tak extend kare, lekin co-ownership ko ek tiered opt-in framework ke roop mein laagu kare, poori tarah mandatory nahi, taaki investment aur kisan hit dono sath chal sakein. Ab main citizens se request karungi ki is debate ko rate karein aur apni raay neeche share karein.

Ref: Rajasthan Farmers Participation in Management of Irrigation Systems Act, 2000 · Section 1-3