Debate Archive
- State Government Cannot Amend Public Park Laws to Permit Commercial Use
- Mass FIR Quashing for Peaceful Assembly Protests Violates the Right to Dissent
- State Police Must Face Contempt Action For Defying High Court's CCTV Mandate
- District Judges' Retirement Age Must Be Raised to 62 Years
- State Electoral Bodies Must Immediately Disqualify Candidates Receiving Undisclosed Foreign Donations
- India's Middle-Income Households Deserve Statutory Protection from Fiscal Squeeze
- Centre Must Obtain State Consent Before Appointing High Court Chief Justice
- Bulk FIR Registration Against Peaceful Protesters Violates Constitutional Right to Assembly
- State Must Enact a Dedicated Statute Regulating and Protecting Peaceful Assembly
- Blanket FIRs Against Peaceful Protesters Violate Fundamental Right to Dissent
- Maharashtra Government Has Failed Its Statutory Duty To Eliminate Manual Scavenging
- Electoral Rolls Deletion Without Prior Notice Violates Voters' Constitutional Rights
- State's Religious Practice Eligibility Test Unconstitutionally Burdens Minority Communities
- Article 142 Should Not Be Used to Quash FIRs in Mass Protest Cases
- State Governments Must Fill All District Consumer Commission Vacancies Within Six Months
- State Has No Right to Depict Judiciary as Corrupt in Mandatory School Textbooks
- State Police Cannot Register FIRs Against Peaceful Protestors Without Prior Judicial Sanction
- Prosecution Sanction for Ministers Must Not Require Governor's Discretionary Approval
- State High Court Must Quash FIRs Filed Against Exam-Leak Protesters
- Supreme Court Judges Must Be Appointed From Legal Academia
- State-Run Institutions Must Permit Hijab as a Protected Religious Practice
- In-House Inquiry Is The Only Valid Mechanism To Address Misconduct Allegations Against Senior Judges
- High Court Alone Has Exclusive Authority To Set Judicial Service Eligibility Rules
- Judicial Misconduct Records Must Be Publicly Disclosed Under Right To Information
- Tamil Nadu Must Establish Dedicated Special Courts Exclusively For UAPA Trials
- India's Judiciary Requires a Complete Structural Overhaul Before 2047
- State Government Has No Right To Delay Local Body Elections For Political Convenience
- OBC Creamy Layer Income Threshold Must Be Raised To Reflect Current Economic Reality
- Maharashtra's State Anti-Conversion Law Unconstitutionally Restricts Religious Freedom
- Executive-Appointed Tribunals Unconstitutionally Undermine Judicial Independence
- State High Court Must Open Direct Recruitment for District Judge Posts
- New Tribunal Laws Unconstitutionally Undermine Judicial Independence
- High Court Should Abolish Written Quota in District Judicial Service Recruitment
- Should India Replace the Death Penalty by Hanging with a More Humane Method of Execution?
- Should India Replace the Death Penalty by Hanging with a More Humane Method of Execution?
- State Law Colleges Must Permit Student Protests Within Campus Premises
- State Law Colleges Must Permit Student Protests Within Campus Premises
- Satirical Comedy Content Should Be Protected Under Free Speech, Not Criminally Prosecuted
- State Law Colleges Must Permit Student Protests Within Campus Premises
- GST Authorities Must Communicate Arrest Authorization to Accused Before Effecting Arrest
- Maharashtra Law Permitting Homeopaths to Practise Allopathy Is Constitutionally Valid
- Article 227 and the Limits of Judicial Interference in Arbitration
- Maharashtra Law Permitting Homeopaths to Practise Allopathy Is Constitutionally Valid
- Maharashtra Law Permitting Homeopaths to Practise Allopathy Is Constitutionally Valid
- Prior Police Permission for Student Protests on Public Premises Violates Article 19
- State Government's Role in High Court Judge Appointments Must Be Curtailed
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- State Government Has Absolute Discretion To Choose Its Own Policy Course
- Prior Police Permission for Student Protests Violates Fundamental Right to Dissent
- Maharashtra's Special Public Security Law Violates Fundamental Rights of Political Dissent
- Should India Abolish the Reservation System in Examinations
- should india remove reservation
- State Police Cannot Detain Student Protesters Without Prior High Court Permission
- State Police Cannot Detain Student Protesters Without Prior High Court Permission
- State Police Cannot Detain Student Protesters Without Prior High Court Permission
- Collegium's Exclusive Power Over High Court Judge Appointments Must Be Abolished
- Sikkim High Court Must Mandate Fully Paperless Proceedings Under State Rules
- The Collegium System Should Be Replaced by a Transparent Statutory Judicial Appointments Commission
- State Governments Must Mandate Banks to Freeze Mule Accounts Within 24 Hours
- Banks Must Be Held Strictly Liable for Facilitating Mule Accounts Linked to Cyber Fraud
- State Governments Must Establish Mandatory SOPs for Freezing Mule Bank Accounts Linked to Cyber Fraud
- Post-Facto Environmental Clearance Violates the Rule of Law
- State High Courts Must Mandatorily Notify Judicial Service Vacancies Within Six Months
- Banks Must Bear Liability for Fraudulent Transactions Through Mule Accounts
- State Government's Mandatory Consultation in High Court Judge Appointments Must Be Abolished
- Judicial Discretion in Bail Must Override Moral or Cultural Biases of Courts
- Maharashtra's Freedom of Religion Act 2026 Unconstitutionally Restricts Individual Right to Convert
- Parliament Has the Constitutional Authority to Expand Supreme Court Bench Strength
- Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Act 2026 Unconstitutionally Restricts Citizens' Right to Convert
- UAPA's Bail Restrictions Violate the Fundamental Right to Personal Liberty
- High Court Must Ban Sealed Cover Submissions in State Government Cases
- Sex Work Must Be Recognised as Legitimate Labour Under Indian Law
- State High Court Should Refuse Writ Where Dispute Arises From Private Contract
- Every State Must Have a Mandatory Policy for Premature Release of Elderly and Terminally Ill Prisoners
- Aadhaar and Voter ID Must Be Accepted as Sufficient Proof of Citizenship in Foreigners Tribunals
- Three-Year Practice Rule for Entry-Level Judges Violates Constitutional Right to Equality
- State Governments Must Enact Mandatory Paid Menstrual Leave Laws for Women Employees
- Detaining Minor Protesters Without Criminal Record Violates Fundamental Rights
- State High Courts Must Mandatorily Follow Supreme Court Constitutional Bench Precedents
- Aviation Accident Investigation Reports Must Be Disclosed to Crash Victims' Families
- State High Courts Must Have Power to Suspend State Laws Pending Constitutional Challenge
- Constitutional Courts Must Decriminalize All Consensual Same-Sex Conduct in India
- Mass Voter Deletion Without Individual Notice Violates Constitutional Right to Franchise
- Mandatory Informed Consent Is Required Before Collecting Students' APAAR ID Data
- State Governments May Dissolve District Consumer Commissions Where Caseload Falls Below 1000
- Bail Must Not Be Denied on Grounds of Lifestyle or Personal Dietary Choices
- State Government's Consultation Role in High Court Judge Appointments Must Be Binding
- Bail Must Not Be Denied on Grounds Unrelated to Legal Prohibitions
- The Education Minister must resign over the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak.
- Should India Establish an Independent Mechanism to Investigate Judicial Misconduct?
- Should State Governments Face High Court Contempt for Demolishing Property Without Due Process?
- Should Courts Apply Broader Interpretation to 'Attempt to Rape' Under IPC Section 376?
- Should High Courts Have Broad Power to Restrain Press Coverage?
- Should High Courts Have Broad Power to Restrain Press Coverage?
- Should Courts Apply Broader Interpretation to 'Attempt to Rape' Under IPC Section 376?
- Should State Governments Face High Court Contempt for Demolishing Property Without Due Process?
- Should India Establish an Independent Mechanism to Investigate Judicial Misconduct?
- Should High Courts Have Power to Restrain Pre-Publication Media Reporting?
- Should Courts Narrowly Interpret 'Attempt to Rape' Under IPC Section 376?
- After winning election, politicians change the party that hurts the voters. Shall there be law protecting this action?
- GST act allows tax payers to claim credit if they fulfil all conditions. GST Council came up with new rule that ITC should be taken only up to ITC available in GSTR 2B. which is conflicting with actual act and purpose.
- We used to get rebate under section 87A under income tax act 1961 against income of capital gain taxable under 112A. As per CPC orders, they denied rebates to such old transactions which seems to be challenge to convey to client.s
- Shall retired judges be constitutionally allowed to join politics or restrict them for few years?
- After winning election, politicians change the party that hurts the voters. Shall there be law protecting this action?
- Should Bombay HC's Cluster Redevelopment Ruling Redefine Tenant Consent Under Maharashtra Law?
- Should Religious Site Disputes Be Resolved Through Negotiated Settlement Over Litigation?
- Can a State Highway Authority Terminate a ₹940-Crore Contract Without Fair Cause?
- Should Courtroom Video Recording Be Regulated By Statutory Guidelines?
- Should District Judge's Opinion Hold Primacy in State's Appointment of Public Prosecutors?
- Should Courts Exercise Greater Leniency in Contempt Cases Involving In-Court Misconduct?
- Should High Courts Direct State Bans on Online Platforms Allegedly Grooming Minors?
- Should Mandatory Reporting of Child Sexual Abuse Be Legally Enforceable Against All Witnesses?
- Should Courts Have Power to Regulate Official Visits by Constitutional Functionaries?
- Should Courts Allow Spousal Access to Private Communication Records in Matrimonial Disputes?
- Should State Governments Be Legally Bound to Compensate Families of Duty-Death Officials?
- Should stamp duty apply to digital arbitration agreements in India?
- Can a State Law Validly Extend Reservation Benefits to Religious Converts?
- Should Judicial Accountability Mechanisms Be Strengthened to Safeguard Constitutional Democracy?
- Can Courts Intervene in Internal Governance Disputes of Sports Bodies?
- Should Supreme Court's 2025 Constitutional Rulings Expand or Limit Fundamental Rights?
- Should Courts Restrict CAG's Statutory Power to Audit Public Utility Discoms?
- Should AI-Generated Content Be Permissible as Evidence or Argument in Courts?
- Should Electoral Roll Verification Override Fundamental Citizenship Rights Under the Constitution?
- Should Pedestrian Rights, Homemaker Wages, and Judicial Appointments Be Codified?
- Should Courts Mandate Compulsory Registration of Pets Posing Threat to Human Life?
- Should AI-Generated Citations in Court Judgments Be Deemed Legally Invalid?
- Should States Hold Exclusive Power to Regulate or Ban Cow Slaughter?
- Should Courts Apply Stricter Standards When Adjudicating Hate Speech Cases?